Restricting choice to improve matching by Yash Kanoria and Daniela Saban Hello friend AMERICAN WORKERS LOOKING FOR JOBS, In the article you read this time with the title Restricting choice to improve matching by Yash Kanoria and Daniela Saban, we have prepared this article well for you to read and take information in it. hopefully the contents of the post Article bank, Article contracting, Article health, Article lecturer, Article manufacturing, Article marketing, Article property, Article public, Article teachers, Article telecommunications,what we write can you understand. okay, happy reading.

Judul : Restricting choice to improve matching by Yash Kanoria and Daniela Saban
link : Restricting choice to improve matching by Yash Kanoria and Daniela Saban

Restricting choice to improve matching by Yash Kanoria and Daniela Saban

Congestion, sometimes in the form of search costs, is a big deal in many matching markets.  Here are some interesting thoughts on that...

Facilitating the Search for Partners on Matching Platforms: Restricting Agents' Actions

Stanford University Graduate School of Business Research Paper No. 17-53

71 Pages Posted: 22 Jul 2017  

Yash Kanoria

Columbia Business School - Decision Risk and Operations

Daniela Saban

Stanford Graduate School of Business

 Abstract

Two-sided matching platforms, such as those for labor, accommodation, dating, and taxi hailing, can control and optimize over many aspects of the search for partners. To understand how the search for partners should be designed, we consider a dynamic two-sided search model with strategic agents who must spend a cost to discover their value for each potential partner. We find that in many settings, the platform can mitigate wasteful search effort by restricting what agents can see/do. Surprisingly, simple restrictions can improve social welfare even when screening costs are small, and agents on each side are ex-ante homogeneous. In asymmetric markets where agents on one side have a tendency to be more selective (due to smaller screening costs or greater market power), the platform should force the more selective side of the market to reach out first, by explicitly disallowing the less selective side from doing so. This allows the agents on the less selective side to exercise more choice in equilibrium. When agents are vertically differentiated, the platform can significantly improve welfare even in the limit of vanishing screening costs, by forcing one side of the market to propose and by hiding quality information. Furthermore, a Pareto improvement in welfare is possible in this limit.

Such is the article Restricting choice to improve matching by Yash Kanoria and Daniela Saban

That's an article Restricting choice to improve matching by Yash Kanoria and Daniela Saban this time, hopefully it can benefit you all. well, see you in other article postings.

You are now reading the article Restricting choice to improve matching by Yash Kanoria and Daniela Saban with the link address https://americanworkerslooking.blogspot.com/2017/09/restricting-choice-to-improve-matching.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: