Judul : The Postdoc Titling Kerfluffle Continues
link : The Postdoc Titling Kerfluffle Continues
The Postdoc Titling Kerfluffle Continues
Previously, on "The Postdoc Titling Kerfluffle", there was a letter, and then a counter-letter. And now, a second letter in support:
I’m on the side of Andrew Lovinger in viewing that postdocs are not students (C&EN, Feb. 20, page 4). I am a postdoc in a federal lab, but I seem to have an experience similar to other non-postdoc contractors.
Those who hire postdocs must say it’s an educational, and hence student-like, experience for one simple reason: It makes the postdocs cheaper. If there is no educational benefit, there is no FICA exemption. With the option between one Ph.D. researcher (including Social Security and Medicare taxes, benefits, etc., beyond the salary) or two postdocs (only a stipend) for the same cost, which would you choose?
In short, I don’t believe postdocs are students, but for tax purposes, it is advantageous for our sponsoring institutions to classify us as such.
Ian McAninch
Abingdon, Md.
I have no dog in this fight, but it is fascinating to me that it continues.
(Is it really true that if there is no educational benefit, there is no FICA exemption?)
Such is the article The Postdoc Titling Kerfluffle Continues
That's an article The Postdoc Titling Kerfluffle Continues this time, hopefully it can benefit you all. well, see you in other article postings.
You are now reading the article The Postdoc Titling Kerfluffle Continues with the link address https://americanworkerslooking.blogspot.com/2017/04/the-postdoc-titling-kerfluffle-continues.html
0 Response to "The Postdoc Titling Kerfluffle Continues"
Post a Comment